Citations (2)


Footnotes (47)



Moral Pluck: Legal Ethics in Popular Culture

William H. Simon

Columbia University - Law School; Stanford University - Stanford Law School

July 2000

Stanford Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 17

Favorable portrayals of lawyers in popular culture tend to adopt a distinctive ethical perspective. This perspective departs radically from the premises of the elite moralism exemplified by the official ethics of the American bar and the arguments of the proponents of President Clinton's impeachment. While elite moralism is strongly authoritarian and categorical, popular culture exalts a quality that might be called Moral Pluck ? a combination of resourcefulness and transgression in the service of basic but informal values. This essay traces the theme of Moral Pluck through three of the most prominent fictional portrayals of lawyers in recent years ? the novels of John Grisham and the TV series L.A. Law and The Practice. It suggests that this work has two potential contributions to legal ethics ? as evidence of popular moral understanding and as a guide to ethical conduct. With respect to the latter contribution, the essay acknowledges various limitations but argues that the work deserves to be taken seriously as ethical discourse, and in particular, that it holds up well in comparison to elite moralism.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: August 15, 2000  

Suggested Citation

Simon, William H., Moral Pluck: Legal Ethics in Popular Culture (July 2000). Stanford Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 17. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=236046 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.236046

Contact Information

William H. Simon (Contact Author)
Columbia University - Law School ( email )
435 West 116th Street
Jerome Greene Hall, Mailbox A-18
New York, NY 10027
United States
212-854-9215 (Phone)
212-854-7946 (Fax)

Stanford University - Stanford Law School ( email )
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States
(650) 723-4605 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,467
Downloads: 631
Download Rank: 31,570
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  47
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Constitutional Fetishism and the Clinton Impeachment Debate
By Michael Klarman