Mickey Mouse and the Idiot Principle for Assessing Research Contribution: Discussion of ‘Is the Relationship between Investment and Conditional Cash Flow Volatility Ambiguous, Asymmetric or Both?’

12 Pages Posted: 28 Nov 2013

Date Written: December 2013

Abstract

Keefe and Tate ([Keefe, M., 2013]) provide both interesting and worthwhile insights into whether, under what circumstances and to what extent cash flow volatility impacts corporate investment. In the current paper, I have two related goals. First, more narrowly, I provide a constructively critical commentary on salient aspects of their empirical strategy, giving particular emphasis to the key drivers of Keefe and Tate's contribution to the literature. Second, illustrated in the context of Keefe and Tate, my broader goal is to give general advice especially aimed at novice researchers on how to make any empirical study more appealing to a critical reader.

Keywords: Cash flow volatility; Financial flexibility; Investment; Real options and financial constraints

Suggested Citation

Faff, Robert W., Mickey Mouse and the Idiot Principle for Assessing Research Contribution: Discussion of ‘Is the Relationship between Investment and Conditional Cash Flow Volatility Ambiguous, Asymmetric or Both?’ (December 2013). Accounting & Finance, Vol. 53, Issue 4, pp. 949-960, 2013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2360834 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12050

Robert W. Faff (Contact Author)

University of Queensland ( email )

St Lucia
Brisbane, Queensland 4072
Australia

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
0
Abstract Views
266
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations will be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information