A Critical View of the Sentencing Commission's Recent Recommendations to 'Strengthen the Guidelines System'

34 Pages Posted: 5 Dec 2013 Last revised: 27 Jan 2014

See all articles by Carissa Byrne Hessick

Carissa Byrne Hessick

University of North Carolina School of Law

Date Written: December 4, 2013

Abstract

In its 2012 report on the continuing impact of Booker, the U.S. Sentencing Commission recommended that Congress consider adopting a number of proposals designed to “strengthen the guidelines system.” In particular, the Commission recommended that Congress: (a) require heightened appellate scrutiny for the substance of sentencing decisions; (b) reconcile statutory language that restricts the Commission’s ability to consider certain offender characteristics in developing guidelines, while apparently requiring courts to consider such characteristics under § 3553(a); (c) codify the three-step sentencing process articulated in federal sentencing guideline §1B1.1; and (d) require district courts to give substantial weight to the guidelines as a factor at sentencing. The Commission’s recommendations to Congress are explicitly designed to ensure that the guidelines play a more prominent role in federal sentencing.

This Symposium Essay argues that accepting the Commission’s recommendations would upset the balance the Supreme Court struck in the Booker remedy. In particular, Booker sought to balance adherence to the guidelines with district court discretion. And, given the uncertain state of federal sentencing doctrine, it is unclear whether the current members of the Court believe that the current balance between guidelines and discretion is constitutionally required, or whether they will permit some congressional tinkering with that balance.

This Symposium Essay identifies another path which might better assure the continued importance of the Guidelines and which does not reduce district court discretion. The Commission can “strengthen the guidelines system” by (1) providing detailed explanations for the numerous policy decisions inherent in the guidelines, (2) amending more guidelines with which there is wide-spread judicial disagreement, and (3) making recommendations to Congress that will increase the legitimacy of the guidelines in the eyes of judges and other sentencing stakeholders.

Keywords: sentencing, U.S. Sentencing Commission, United States v. Booker, Sixth Amendment

Suggested Citation

Hessick, Carissa Byrne, A Critical View of the Sentencing Commission's Recent Recommendations to 'Strengthen the Guidelines System' (December 4, 2013). Houston Law Review, Vol. 51, No. 5, 2014; University of Utah College of Law Research Paper No. 50. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2363722

Carissa Byrne Hessick (Contact Author)

University of North Carolina School of Law ( email )

Van Hecke-Wettach Hall, 160 Ridge Road
CB #3380
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3380
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
36
Abstract Views
942
PlumX Metrics