The Curious Case of the Secondary Market with Respect to Investor Protection

Adi Osovsky

Harvard University, Law School, Students

January 1, 2014

Tennessee Law Review, Vol. 82, No. 1, 2014

The primary mission of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is to protect investors. However, current securities regulation clearly separates between public markets and private markets with respect to investor protection. While the federal securities laws impose strict and costly disclosure and anti-fraud requirements on issuers that offer their securities to the public, they exempt private offerings from such rigid regime. The liberal approach toward private offerings is based on the assumption that investors in private markets are sophisticated and thus can "fend for themselves".

This Article explores the validity of such traditional dichotomy between the public market and the private market in a relatively new, organized secondary market for ownership interests in private companies with retail investor access (the "Secondary Market"). The Secondary Market provides investors and employees with an opportunity to sell their holdings even before the first exit event. It also allows greater flexibility in capital formation, which may enhance productivity and job growth. However, the Secondary Market raises serious problems with regard to investor protection.

As this Article shows, the rise of the Secondary Market has revealed conspicuous cracks in the wall traditionally separating the public and the private markets and the two markets’ participants – the sophisticated investors versus the unsophisticated investors. This separation was undermined by the penetration of unsophisticated investors to the private market sphere and by the erosion of the assumptions regarding the ability of Secondary Market’s participants to fend for themselves.

The Article suggests that the erosion of the sophistication presumption deems the classic dichotomy between the heavily regulated public market and the lightly regulated private market artificial. It calls for a reexamination of the current regulatory regime with respect to investor protection. Such reexamination is of particular importance in light of the new Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act that would enable private companies to stay private longer, and the Secondary Market to thrive.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 53

Keywords: securities regulation, investor protection, secondary market, public market, private market, accredited investors, sophisticated investors, regulation D, disclosure, private offerings, resales, liquidity, JOBS Act, secondmarket, sharespost, behavioral economics, behavioral finance, cognitive biases

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: December 8, 2013 ; Last revised: February 1, 2015

Suggested Citation

Osovsky, Adi, The Curious Case of the Secondary Market with Respect to Investor Protection (January 1, 2014). Tennessee Law Review, Vol. 82, No. 1, 2014. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2364542 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2364542

Contact Information

Adi Osovsky (Contact Author)
Harvard University, Law School, Students ( email )
1563 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 920
Downloads: 191
Download Rank: 125,361