More Order with Less Law: On Contract Enforcement, Trust and Crowding
44 Pages Posted: 19 Jul 2000
Date Written: July 7, 2000
Abstract
Most contracts, whether between voters and politicians or between house owners and contractors, are incomplete. "More law", it typically is assumed, increases the likelihood of contract performance by increasing the probability of enforcement and/or the cost of breach. This paper studies a contractual relationship where the first mover has to decide whether she wants to enter a contract without knowing whether the second mover will perform. We analyze how contract enforceability affects individual performance for exogenous preferences. Then we apply a dynamic model of preference adaptation and find that economic incentives have a non-monotonic impact on behavior. Individuals perform a contract when enforcement is strong or weak but not with medium enforcement probabilities. Trustworthiness is "crowded in" with weak and "crowded out" with medium enforcement. In a laboratory experiment we test our model's implications and find support for the crowding prediction. Our finding is in line with the recent work on the role of contract enforcement and trust in formerly Communist countries.
JEL Classification: C73, C91, K42, L14
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity
By Ernst Fehr and Simon Gächter
-
Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity
By Ernst Fehr and Simon Gächter
-
Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments
By Ernst Fehr and Simon Gächter
-
Social Norms and Welfare State Dynamics
By Assar Lindbeck, Sten Nyberg, ...
-
The Evolution of Strong Reciprocity: Cooperation in Heterogeneous Populations
By Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis
-
Wages, Profits and Rent-Sharing
By David G. Blanchflower, Andrew J. Oswald, ...
-
Does Unmeasured Ability Explain Inter-Industry Wage Differentials?
-
The Behavioral Impact of Emotions in a Power-to-Take Game: An Experimental Study