What is Constitutional Obligation?

18 Pages Posted: 12 Dec 2013 Last revised: 17 Dec 2013

See all articles by Abner S. Greene

Abner S. Greene

Fordham University School of Law

Date Written: December 11, 2013


Mike Seidman’s book, On Constitutional Disobedience, offers an impressive challenge to constitutional fidelity. With much of it, my book Against Obligation is on all fours – we both share the view that our Constitution’s meaning should not be bound by past sources. Seidman seems to go further, though, and reject the bindingness of the Constitution as a text. What does it mean to ask whether the Constitution itself obligates? Most of the Constitution doesn’t set rules for citizens; rather, it establishes powers, and what we might consider conditional obligations, for officials. All government officials in the United States swear an oath of fealty to the Constitution, and thus, despite one’s views on political obligation generally (in Against Obligation, I argue that there is no general, content-independent, moral duty to obey the law), one might think that in taking their jobs, officials in the U.S. accept the Constitution and are bound by it. In this essay, I also respond to some of Seidman’s critiques of my book.

Suggested Citation

Greene, Abner S., What is Constitutional Obligation? (December 11, 2013). Boston University Law Review, Vol. 93, No. 1239, 2013; Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2366353. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2366353

Abner S. Greene (Contact Author)

Fordham University School of Law ( email )

140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States

Register to save articles to
your library


Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics