Plea Bargaining: Some Comparative Observations

(forthcoming 2014) ‘Plea Bargaining: A Comparative Analysis’ in Wright, J (ed-in-chief) International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (Amsterdam: Elsevier)

Warwick School of Law Research Paper No. 2013/29

11 Pages Posted: 13 Dec 2013  

Jacqueline Hodgson

University of Warwick - School of Law

Date Written: December 12, 2013

Abstract

Plea and sentence bargaining is characterized by several general features that we might recognize as common across a range of jurisdictions and procedural traditions. It requires an admission of guilt from the accused; the accused is offered some reward, incentive or advantage, either in exchange for, or as a result of the plea; and there is some benefit to the criminal justice system – typically the avoidance of a more lengthy and expensive contested trial. The point in the criminal process at which these negotiations are initiated, the personnel involved, and the relative incentives and benefits available will of course differ. In some instances, explicit bargains are struck between prosecutor and defense lawyer; in others, there is direct judicial involvement; and in others, the system benefit may operate as an implicit reward, without any explicit bargaining taking place.

Suggested Citation

Hodgson, Jacqueline, Plea Bargaining: Some Comparative Observations (December 12, 2013). (forthcoming 2014) ‘Plea Bargaining: A Comparative Analysis’ in Wright, J (ed-in-chief) International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (Amsterdam: Elsevier); Warwick School of Law Research Paper No. 2013/29. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2366847

Jacqueline S. Hodgson (Contact Author)

University of Warwick - School of Law ( email )

Gibbet Hill Road
Coventry CV4 7AL, CV4 7AL
United Kingdom
02476 524163 (Phone)
02476 524105 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/staff/academic/hodgson

Paper statistics

Downloads
191
Rank
129,365
Abstract Views
638