International Trade Law and the Arbitration of Administrative Law Matters: Farrel v. U.S. International Trade Commission

23 Pages Posted: 19 Dec 2013

See all articles by Ronald A. Brand

Ronald A. Brand

University of Pittsburgh - School of Law

Date Written: 1993


With support from the executive branch, Congress, and the courts, arbitration has become an increasingly popular method of international dispute resolution. While agreements to arbitrate traditionally were frowned upon, particularly when the dispute involved certain “public law” or “statutory” matters, the situation has changed dramatically in the past few decades. United States courts now routinely order arbitration of disputes implicating important policy issues in securities, antitrust, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (“RICO”), and employment law matters. By the end of the 1980’s, the presence of a public or “statutory” issue seemed no longer to be a distinguishing factor; arbitration, when selected by the parties in a binding agreement, would be the method of dispute settlement.

Just as most legal trends met with limitations, in 1992 this liberal enforcement of arbitration agreements was rejected by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Farrel v. United States International Trade Commission. The Farrel decision is troubling for those who believe contracting parties should have unlimited autonomy to select arbitration as a form of dispute settlement in international transactions...Farrel compels further consideration of the relationship among private dispute settlement arrangements, national laws governing international trade, and sovereign international trade obligations.

This commentary begins by reviewing the background of U.S. law regarding enforcement of arbitration agreements, against which the Farrel decision must be considered. It then addresses Farrel's effect on substantive trade law issues. Finally, it concludes that Farrel raises serious concerns about U.S. compliance with GATT obligations and U.S. courts’ future practice in dealing with those obligations.

Keywords: international trade law, dispute resolution, arbitration, contracts, enforcement, administrative law, Farrel v. U.S. International Trade Commission, GATT obligations, litigation, sovereign international trade obligations, private dispute settlements, U.S. Federal Arbitration Act, New York Convention

JEL Classification: K19, K33

Suggested Citation

Brand, Ronald A., International Trade Law and the Arbitration of Administrative Law Matters: Farrel v. U.S. International Trade Commission (1993). Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 31, p. 181, 1993, U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper , Available at SSRN:

Ronald A. Brand (Contact Author)

University of Pittsburgh - School of Law ( email )

3900 Forbes Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics