Death Row Confessions and the Last Meal Test of Innocence

Kevin M. Kniffin

Cornell University - Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management

Brian Wansink

Cornell University

December 31, 2013

Laws 2014, 3(1), 1-11

Post hoc analyses of Rector v. Arkansas have regularly highlighted that the defendant requested that part of his last meal be saved so that he could it eat later. While the observation is typically raised as part of arguments that Rector was incompetent and unfit for execution, the more basic fact is that commentators have drawn important inferences about Rector’s mental state from how he treated his last meal. In this essay, we draw upon multiple disciplines in order to apply the same inferential logic to a much broader sample and explore the question of whether traditionally customized last meals might offer signals of defendants’ guilt or innocence. To investigate this, the content of last-meal requests and last words reported for people executed in the United States during a recent five-year period were examined. Consistent with the idea that declination of the last meal is equivalent to a signal of (self-perceived) innocence, those who denied guilt were 2.7 times as likely to decline a last meal than people who admitted guilt (29% versus 8%). Consistent with the complementary theory that people who admit guilt are relatively more “at peace” with their sentence, these individuals requested 34% more calories of food than the rest of the sample (2786 versus 2085 calories). A third finding is that those who denied guilt also tended to eat significantly fewer brand-name food items. Previous discussions of last meals have often lacked quantitative measurements; however, this systematic analysis shows that last meal requests offer windows into self-perceived or self-proclaimed innocence. Knowing one’s last meal request and one’s last words can provide valuable new variables for retrospectively assessing the processes that led to past executions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 11

Keywords: capital punishment; death penalty; last meals; last words; eating; food; traditions; execution; innocent; guilty

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: December 31, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Kniffin, Kevin M. and Wansink, Brian, Death Row Confessions and the Last Meal Test of Innocence (December 31, 2013). Laws 2014, 3(1), 1-11. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2373568

Contact Information

Kevin M. Kniffin (Contact Author)
Cornell University - Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management ( email )
Ithaca, NY
United States
Brian Wansink
Cornell University ( email )
Ithaca, NY 14853
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,770
Downloads: 301
Download Rank: 78,377