Constitutional Forbearance - In the Eye of the Beholder?

5 Pages Posted: 1 Jan 2014

See all articles by Allen Rostron

Allen Rostron

University of Missouri at Kansas City - School of Law

Date Written: November 15, 2012

Abstract

In his insightful article on Constitutional Forbearance, Professor A. Christopher Bryant called for the Supreme Court to demonstrate that constitutional interpretation is not entirely a matter of partisan policy preferences. He observed that the Court’s conservative members almost invariably read the Constitution in ways that please Republicans, while liberal Justices consistently toe the Democratic Party line. Thinking about examples offered by Professor Bryant, however, particularly decisions made by Justice James McReynolds, leads me to wonder whether his article understates to some extent the difficulty of determining what constitutes constitutional forbearance. In other words, while the notion of judges being willing to make decisions contrary to their personal preferences is highly appealing in the abstract, is it really possible for us to know with any certainty when we have witnessed an instance of constitutional forbearance?

Keywords: Constitution, Supreme Court, forbearance, political

Suggested Citation

Rostron, Allen K., Constitutional Forbearance - In the Eye of the Beholder? (November 15, 2012). University of Richmond Law Review, Unjust EnRICHment, 2012. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2373596

Allen K. Rostron (Contact Author)

University of Missouri at Kansas City - School of Law ( email )

5100 Rockhill Road
Kansas City, MO 64110-2499
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
19
Abstract Views
278
PlumX Metrics