The Politics of (Legal) Intertextuality

Philip Liste

University of Hamburg

January 29, 2010

International Political Sociology 4:3 (2010), 319-322

Interdisciplinary research can be a struggle and often enough, scholars do systematically misunderstand each other. IR scholars and international lawyers do engage in rather different projects — even when the former are increasingly interested in international legal norms or the legalization of world politics. However, I think one cannot simply blame “disciplinary boundaries” for these misunderstandings. In IR and International Law, we face “paradigmatic divides” that, more often than not, transcend disciplinary boundaries. To illustrate this point, the concept of intertextuality is quite useful. Intertextuality is used by international lawyers and IR theorists alike. I argue that this provides a chance to consider law in its societal environment and thus the position of law therein. Finally, intertextuality also allows for a critical scholarship in both International Law and IR.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 6

Keywords: International Relations, International Law, Interdisciplinarity, Intertextuality, international Political Sociology

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: January 2, 2014  

Suggested Citation

Liste, Philip, The Politics of (Legal) Intertextuality (January 29, 2010). International Political Sociology 4:3 (2010), 319-322. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2373682

Contact Information

Philip Liste (Contact Author)
University of Hamburg ( email )
Allende-Platz 1
Hamburg, 20146
HOME PAGE: http://www.philipliste.de
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 167
Downloads: 34