Measuring Aid Flows: A New Approach
39 Pages Posted: 16 Aug 2000
There are 2 versions of this paper
Measuring Aid Flows: A New Approach
Measuring Aid Flows: A New Approach
Date Written: December 1998
Abstract
Conventional measures of aid are not designed to estimate the overall aid content of financial flows. Furthermore, they typically overstate the grant elements of concessional loans, thus understating relative aid flows to recipients getting mostly grants and from donors giving mostly grants (and loans in high-yield currencies).
A new approach to measuring aid flows-Effective Development Assistance-focuses on the overall grant equivalent of official financial flows and allows meaningful comparisons of recipients or donors. Debate about the effectiveness of foreign aid has intensified in recent years, as budgetary pressures on aid have increased in donor countries. Whatever the merits of opposing arguments, the question is: do conventional measures of aid (such as OECD's Net ODA), which lump together grants and loans, accurately reflect true aid flows?
Chang, Fernández-Arias, and Serven analyze the methodological shortcomings of conventional measures of aid and propose a new approach, which measures official aid flows as the sum of grants and the grant-equivalents of official loans (in a new aggregate they call Effective Development Assistance, or EDA).
They show how results using this conceptually superior measure may differ significantly from conventional aggregates, providing a quite different view on major aid trends.
They implement their approach empirically using data on some 40,000 official loans from the World Bank's DRS database-virtually all of the official loans to 133 developing countries from 1975 to 1995. The numerical results underscore several points: - The conventional approach has led to systematic overestimates of the concessionality of official loans. This overestimate has increased significantly since the mid-1980s. Conventional methods show a rising trend; the new method shows the opposite. - Net ODA increasingly overstates the true aid content of official flows, although the divergence between the two approaches is somewhat muted by the rising relative importance of grants over loans in total official flows.
This paper - a product of Macroeconomics and Growth, Development Research Group - is part of a larger effort in the group to understand the effectiveness of development aid. The authors may be contacted at cchang6@worldbank.org or lserven@worldbank.org.
JEL Classification: F35, O19
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By A. Craig Burnside and David Dollar
-
Aid, Policies, and Growth: Revisiting the Evidence
By A. Craig Burnside and David Dollar
-
Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why?
By Alberto F. Alesina and David Dollar
-
Aid Allocation and Poverty Reduction
By David Dollar and Paul Collier
-
Aid and Growth: What Does the Cross-Country Evidence Really Show?
-
Aid and Growth: What Does the Cross-Country Evidence Really Show?
-
New Data, New Doubts: Revisiting 'Aid, Policies, and Growth'
By William Easterly, Ross Levine, ...
-
New Data, New Doubts: A Comment on Burnside and Dollar's "Aid, Policies, and Growth" (2000)
By William Easterly, Ross Levine, ...