Preventive Pre-Trial Detention Without Punishment

Res Publica, Forthcoming

26 Pages Posted: 7 Jan 2014

Date Written: January 6, 2014

Abstract

The pre-trial detention of individuals charged with crimes is viewed by many legal scholars as problematic. Standard arguments against it are that it constitutes legal punishment of individuals not yet convicted of crimes, violates the presumption of innocence, and rests on dubious predictions of future crime. I defend modified and restrained forms of pre-trial detention. I argue that pre-trial detention could be made very different than imprisonment, should be governed by strict criteria, and is warranted, when the evidence of danger is convincing. I contend that the presumption of innocence does not preclude us from doing many other things to criminal suspects and defendants that imply their guilt. Finally, I dispute arguments designed to show that pre-trial detention can be justified to prevent absconding or interferences with the course of justice, but not to prevent other, and sometimes much more serious, offenses.

Keywords: pre-trial detention, legal punishment, presumption of innocence, prevention

Suggested Citation

Lippke, Richard, Preventive Pre-Trial Detention Without Punishment (January 6, 2014). Res Publica, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2375377

Richard Lippke (Contact Author)

Indiana University ( email )

Department of Criminal Justice
Bloomington, IN
United States
812-856-6049 (Phone)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
76
Abstract Views
397
rank
346,434
PlumX Metrics