Classical Liberal Constitution or Classical Liberal Construction?

31 Pages Posted: 9 Jan 2014

See all articles by Gary Lawson

Gary Lawson

University of Florida Levin College of Law

Date Written: January 7, 2014

Abstract

In The Classical Liberal Constitution: The Uncertain Quest for Limited Government (2013), Richard Epstein says that he "incorporates but goes beyond" originalist theory by calling for adjudication "in sync with" classical liberal theory political theory, which Professor Epstein claims underlies the Constitution. Without in any way detracting from the numerous virtues of this book, I argue that this is primarily a work of constitutional construction rather than constitutional interpretation. From the standpoint of interpretation, the background rules that best supplement the constitutional text are found in eighteenth-century fiduciary law rather than in classical liberal political theory, though the latter is relevant in many contexts. From the standpoint of adjudication, the Constitution implicitly prescribes a set of default rules, rather than reliance on political theory, to govern in the face of interpretative indeterminacy. Hence, Professor Epstein’s adjudicative scheme cannot be derived from interpretation of the Constitution but must result from constitutional construction.

Keywords: constitutional theory, constitutional interpretation, constitutional construction

Suggested Citation

Lawson, Gary, Classical Liberal Constitution or Classical Liberal Construction? (January 7, 2014). NYU Journal of Law & Liberty, Forthcoming, Boston Univ. School of Law, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 14-2, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2375787 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2375787

Gary Lawson (Contact Author)

University of Florida Levin College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 117625
Gainesville, FL 32611-7625
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
212
Abstract Views
3,220
Rank
296,268
PlumX Metrics