19 Pages Posted: 14 Jan 2014 Last revised: 20 Jan 2014
Date Written: January 13, 2014
In order to identify the form of arbitrariness that is relevant to the rule of law, I discuss a Supreme Court of India decision and a Supreme Court of Canada decision in which judges held that other public authorities had acted arbitrarily. I also discuss Jeremy Bentham’s work on the rule of law, and his notion that the interpretive power of judges is itself an arbitrary power. I argue that the interpretive role of judges is not necessarily hostile to the rule of law, but that there is a standing tension between the two. In the decisions under discussion, the Canadian and Indian judges used their doctrines of arbitrariness to reallocate power to themselves, without any resulting enhancement in the rule of law.
Keywords: arbitrary government, rule of law, judges, interpretation, constitutional litigation, administrative law, Jeremy Bentham
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation