Companies Take Heed: The Misleading or Deceptive Conduct Provisions Are Gaining Prominence

(2012) 30 Company and Securities Law Journal 342

UWA Faculty of Law Research Paper

25 Pages Posted: 16 Jan 2014

See all articles by Gill North

Gill North

Deakin University, Geelong, Australia - Deakin Law School

Date Written: 2012

Abstract

Provisions that prohibit misleading or deceptive conduct are included in several Australian statutes. The article considers these provisions, with a particular focus on company disclosure matters. It reviews the regulation, empirical research, case law, class actions, and the links and connections across the provisions and with the continuous disclosure obligations. It argues that listed company directors and managers ought to carefully review their public disclosure processes and cultures. The focus and balance of the company disclosure regulatory framework appears to be shifting and the misleading or deceptive conduct provisions are becoming more prominent. Recent high-profile litigation by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission against listed companies alleging misleading or deceptive conduct and contravention of the continuous disclosure provisions has succeeded. Moreover, a growing number of class actions founded on misleading or deceptive conduct and a failure to disclose are being launched and settled.

Suggested Citation

North, Gill, Companies Take Heed: The Misleading or Deceptive Conduct Provisions Are Gaining Prominence (2012). (2012) 30 Company and Securities Law Journal 342; UWA Faculty of Law Research Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2379239

Gill North (Contact Author)

Deakin University, Geelong, Australia - Deakin Law School ( email )

221 Burwood Highway
Burwood
Burwood, Victoria 3125, Victoria 3125
Australia

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
100
rank
250,697
Abstract Views
457
PlumX Metrics