Damages Under the UN Sale of Goods Convention

Canadian International Lawyer, 9:2 (2013) pp. 82-85

4 Pages Posted: 16 Jan 2014  

Peter J. Mazzacano

University of Derby Online Learning

Date Written: October 1, 2013

Abstract

This article provides an overview of damages under the United Nation Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (“CISG”) and compares how they differ from what might be typical under Canadian provincial sale of goods law. CISG Article 74 establishes the basic principles concerning recovery and the calculation of damages, and it reflects the general principle of full compensation (not unlike the Supreme Court’s “actual loss”). In contrast with the common law system, which requires that a loss be contemplated by both parties, the CISG makes it clear that it is foreseeability of the breaching party that is of legal significance. In addition, the CISG’s foreseeability test is both subjective and objective: the party may be held liable not only for losses which it actually foresaw, but also for losses which it “ought to have foreseen.” Thus, to make a party liable, it is not necessary to prove that the party actually foresaw the loss in question, as long as it was in a position to reasonably foresee the loss.

Keywords: Damages, Contracts, CISG, UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, Private International Law, Sale of Goods

Suggested Citation

Mazzacano, Peter J., Damages Under the UN Sale of Goods Convention (October 1, 2013). Canadian International Lawyer, 9:2 (2013) pp. 82-85. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2379619

Peter J. Mazzacano (Contact Author)

University of Derby Online Learning ( email )

Room 208, Enterprise Centre, 37 Bridge Street
Derby, DE1 3LD
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://www.cisg.ca

Paper statistics

Downloads
166
Rank
146,941
Abstract Views
787