Context Matters: Disability, the End of Life, and Why the Conversation Is Still so Difficult

20 Pages Posted: 18 Jan 2014 Last revised: 10 Feb 2014

Date Written: January 16, 2014

Abstract

This essay addresses the context that gives rise to conflicts between disability rights advocates and advocates for choice in dying. It argues that choice-in-dying advocates who want to diffuse the tension that marks interactions with disability-rights activists must begin to address the marginalizing, stigmatizing, and discriminatory aspects of the health care system sometimes experienced by people with disabilities. It then explores the experience of people with disabilities in the U.S. healthcare system, including disparities in care, and suggests that by better attending to systematic disparities faced by people with disabilities, advocates for choice in dying might begin to build trust and better communication with disability advocates.

Keywords: Disability, Bioethics, End of Life, Physician Aid in Dying, Discrimination, Health

Suggested Citation

Ouellette, Alicia R., Context Matters: Disability, the End of Life, and Why the Conversation Is Still so Difficult (January 16, 2014). New York Law School Law Review, Vol. 58, p. 371, 2013-2014, Albany Law School Research Paper No. 11 for 2013-2014, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2380329

Alicia R. Ouellette (Contact Author)

Albany Law School ( email )

80 New Scotland Avenue
Albany, NY 12208
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
124
Abstract Views
853
rank
252,760
PlumX Metrics