Warrantless, Pre-Arrest DNA Testing and a Suspect's Right to Refuse: Amicus Brief filed in State of Maine v. Spencer Glover (Maine Supreme Judicial Court 2014)

25 Pages Posted: 20 Jan 2014 Last revised: 23 Jan 2014

Date Written: November 1, 2013

Abstract

When law enforcement seeks to obtain a warrantless, pre-arrest DNA sample from an individual, that individual has the right to say "No." If silence is to become a "badge of guilt," then the right to silence — under the United States and Maine Constitutions — might become a thing of the past. Allowing jurors to infer consciousness of guilt from a pre-arrest DNA sample violates the Fourth Amendment to the United States and Maine Constitutions.

Keywords: criminal law, constitutional law, courts, fourth amendment, search and seizure, due process, privacy, equal protection

JEL Classification: K40

Suggested Citation

Lamparello, Adam and MacLean, Charles, Warrantless, Pre-Arrest DNA Testing and a Suspect's Right to Refuse: Amicus Brief filed in State of Maine v. Spencer Glover (Maine Supreme Judicial Court 2014) (November 1, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2381578 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2381578

Charles MacLean

affiliation not provided to SSRN

No contact information is available for Adam Lamparello

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
41
Abstract Views
636
PlumX Metrics