Initial Interest Confusion

(2013) 8 Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice 311

19 Pages Posted: 22 Jan 2014

See all articles by Ilanah Simon Fhima

Ilanah Simon Fhima

Institute of Brand and Innovation Law, Unversity College London

Date Written: January 20, 2014

Abstract

Traditionally, trade mark law has focused on confusion which occurs at the time of sale. However, in a number of recent decisions, most notably, Och-Ziff, it has been suggested that pre-sale or initial interest confusion may be actionable under registered trade mark law.

Although initial interest confusion has had a recent ‘moment in the limelight’, there is authority to support its recognition dating back at least a decade. However, one of the main obstacles to the recognition of initial interest confusion is identifying the damage involved. This has caused particular difficulties in relation to passing off. The extent to which initial interest confusion can cause damage, and whether damage is indeed needed for the confusion element of registered trade mark infringement is considered in this context.

Recognition of initial interest confusion has a number of potential applications in both the online and offline world. However, it is argued that judging the merits of initial interest confusion in isolation is too limiting. Instead, any form of ‘operative confusion’, i.e., which has an effect on how consumers behave, should be actionable.

Keywords: trademark, trade mark, internet, initial interest confusion

JEL Classification: K39, O34

Suggested Citation

Simon, Ilanah, Initial Interest Confusion (January 20, 2014). (2013) 8 Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice 311, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2382000

Ilanah Simon (Contact Author)

Institute of Brand and Innovation Law, Unversity College London ( email )

Gower St
London WC1E OEG, WC1E 6BT
United Kingdom

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
77
Abstract Views
526
rank
337,384
PlumX Metrics