Relying on Demeanour Evidence to Assess Credibility during Trial - A Critical Examination

47 Pages Posted: 26 Jan 2014 Last revised: 23 Feb 2014

Date Written: January 1, 2014


Demeanour evidence is relied on by the justice system in one of the most important assessments at a trial, namely to assess the credibility of witnesses including complainants and accuseds. This use has also been the source of recent controversy in the case of R v NS where a sexual assault complainant was ordered to remove her niqab before she would be allowed to testify. This paper examines the common law assumption that witnesses in common law criminal courts are required to testify with their faces visible and the origins of this assumption. This paper argues that based on strong social science research the reliance on demeanour cues can be a distracting and unreliable method to assess credibility and increases the potential for wrongful prosecutions and convictions, reduced access to justice for marginalized groups and has a detrimental effect on the truth-seeking function of a trial as whole.

Keywords: demeanour evidence, credibility assessments, Niqab, face-to-face confrontation, full answer and defence, cross-examination, deception detection

Suggested Citation

Qureshi, Amna, Relying on Demeanour Evidence to Assess Credibility during Trial - A Critical Examination (January 1, 2014). Available at SSRN: or

Amna Qureshi (Contact Author)

University of Ottawa ( email )

2292 Edwin Crescent
Ottawa, Ontario K2C 1H7

Register to save articles to
your library


Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics

Under construction: SSRN citations will be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information