The Constitutional Limit of Zero Tolerance in Schools

Derek W. Black

University of South Carolina - School of Law

January 25, 2014

Minnesota Law Review, Forthcoming

With the introduction of modern zero tolerance policies, schools now punish much more behavior than they ever have before. But not all the behavior is bad. Schools have expelled the student who brings aspirin or fingernail clippers to campus, who does not know that a keychain knife in his backpack, or who reports having taken away a knife from another student in order to keep everyone safe. Despite challenges to these examples, courts have upheld the suspension and expulsion of this good-faith, innocuous behavior. With little explanation, courts have opined that the Constitution places no meaningful limit on the application of zero tolerance policies. Indeed, courts have been so dismissive of constitutional challenges that most scholars all but concede the constitutionality of zero tolerance, arguing instead that schools should voluntarily adopt policy changes. This is incorrect. Although the constitution confers significant discretion on schools to regulate student behavior, that discretion does not include the authority to entirely strip students of their constitutional rights and punish them for any reason a school deems fit. This Article argues that fundamental principles of substantive due process limit zero tolerance. In particular, substantive due process prohibits state actors from (1) treating substantially dissimilarly situated students as though they are the same; (2) disregarding a student’s good-faith mistakes or innocence; and (3) presupposing the answers to due process inquiries so as to render hearings meaningless. Zero tolerance policies breach each of these principles and represent a broad overreach of state power, akin to the sort of state overreaching that the Supreme Court has struck down in related areas of juvenile justice. To comply with due process, the state must consider students’ intent and culpability, along with the potential harm posed by the behavior at issue. Contrary to conventional wisdom, courts can strike down zero tolerance policies that fail to take these steps without re-crafting constitutional doctrine.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 59

Keywords: schools, students, discipline, zero tolerance, expulsion, suspension, due process, constitution, rights

JEL Classification: I2, K1

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: January 27, 2014 ; Last revised: July 15, 2014

Suggested Citation

Black, Derek W., The Constitutional Limit of Zero Tolerance in Schools (January 25, 2014). Minnesota Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2385283 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2385283

Contact Information

Derek W. Black (Contact Author)
University of South Carolina - School of Law ( email )
Main & Greene Streets
Columbia, SC 29208
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,230
Downloads: 285
Download Rank: 79,838