Strict Products Liability at 50: Four Histories

Kyle Graham

Santa Clara University School of Law

January 26, 2014

Marquette Law Review, Vol. 98, 2014

This article offers four different perspectives on the strict products-liability "revolution" that climaxed a half-century ago. One of these narratives relates the prevailing assessment of how this innovation coalesced and spread across the states. The three alternative histories introduced by this article both challenge and complement the standard account by viewing the shift toward strict products liability through "populist," "practical," and "contingent" lenses, respectively. The first of these narratives considers the contributions that plaintiffs and their counsel made toward this change in the law. The second focuses upon how certain types of once-common products cases forged a practical argument for strict products liability as a superior alternative to negligence. The third examines why tort law eclipsed warranty as the doctrinal forum for products-liability reform. This article concludes that these non-canonical accounts have been obscured due to patterns and biases that recur across descriptions of doctrinal development in tort law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 71

Keywords: tort, torts, tort law, products liability, legal history, negligence, warranty

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: January 28, 2014 ; Last revised: February 24, 2016

Suggested Citation

Graham, Kyle, Strict Products Liability at 50: Four Histories (January 26, 2014). Marquette Law Review, Vol. 98, 2014. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2385731 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2385731

Contact Information

Kyle Graham (Contact Author)
Santa Clara University School of Law ( email )
500 El Camino Real
Santa Clara, CA 95053
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,191
Downloads: 125
Download Rank: 179,823