Download This PaperIntellectual Property Experimentalism by Way of Competition Law
9 Competition Policy Int'l 30 (2013)
12 Pages Posted: 28 Jan 2014 Last revised: 31 Mar 2014
Date Written: January 1, 2014
Abstract
Competition law and Intellectual Property have divergent intellectual cultures – the former more pragmatic and experimentalist; the latter influenced by natural law and vested rights. The US Supreme Court decision in Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis is an intellectual victory for the former approach, one that suggests that antitrust law can and should be used to introduce greater scrutiny of the specific consequences of intellectual property grants.
Keywords: patent, copyright, antitrust, competition
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Wu, Tim, Intellectual Property Experimentalism by Way of Competition Law (January 1, 2014). 9 Competition Policy Int'l 30 (2013), Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 14-388, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2386415
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.