Buyer Beware: Georgia Consumers Can't Rely on the Fair Business Practices Act

John Marshall Law Journal, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 507-532, 2013

Georgia State University College of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014-04

27 Pages Posted: 5 Feb 2014 Last revised: 7 Mar 2014

See all articles by Mark Elliott Budnitz

Mark Elliott Budnitz

Georgia State University College of Law

Date Written: 2013

Abstract

In Novare Group, Inc. v. Sarif, the Georgia Supreme Court rejected the plaintiffs' claim that the defendant brokers and developers violated the Georgia Fair Business Practices Act ("FBPA"), Georgia's primary consumer protection statute. The author contends that the court's approach in Novare undermines the Georgia General Assembly's purpose in enacting the FBPA to protect consumers from unfair or deceptive practices. The article criticizes the court for treating claims under the FBPA the same as common law fraud claims. It also examines the court's treatment of reliance, parol evidence, merger clauses and legislative silence. Finally, the article discusses the implications for future actions seeking redress for FBPA violations.

Keywords: Georgia, Fair Business Practices Act, consumer protection, statutory interpretation, reliance, parol evidence, merger, legislative silence

JEL Classification: K12, K19, K29, K30, K39

Suggested Citation

Budnitz, Mark Elliott, Buyer Beware: Georgia Consumers Can't Rely on the Fair Business Practices Act (2013). John Marshall Law Journal, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 507-532, 2013, Georgia State University College of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014-04, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2390801

Mark Elliott Budnitz (Contact Author)

Georgia State University College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 4037
Atlanta, GA 30302-4037
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
140
Abstract Views
894
Rank
375,952
PlumX Metrics