Consistency of Jurisprudence, Finality of Acquittals, and Ne Bis in Idem – Comments Occasioned by the Šainović et al. Appeal Judgment and the OTP Motion for Reconsideration of the Perišić Appeal Judgment

16 Pages Posted: 8 Feb 2014

See all articles by Sergey Vasiliev

Sergey Vasiliev

Department of Criminal Law; University of Amsterdam - Amsterdam Center for International Law

Date Written: February 7, 2014

Abstract

This note comments on the implications of the change in the ICTY appellate jurisprudence regarding 'specific direction' as the element of the aiding and abetting liability from Perišić to Šainović, as well as on the prosecution motion for reconsideration of the former judgment in light of the latter . The paper addresses the contention between the differently constituted appellate benches from the perspective of judicial restraint, legal certainty, and stability of jurisprudence. It argues that the ICTY must uphold the principles of ne bis in idem and res judicata when deciding on the admissibility and merits of the prosecution motion.

Keywords: Perišić, Šainović, specific direction, reconsideration, review, legal certainty, ne bis in idem, res judicata

Suggested Citation

Vasiliev, Sergey, Consistency of Jurisprudence, Finality of Acquittals, and Ne Bis in Idem – Comments Occasioned by the Šainović et al. Appeal Judgment and the OTP Motion for Reconsideration of the Perišić Appeal Judgment (February 7, 2014). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2392303 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2392303

Sergey Vasiliev (Contact Author)

Department of Criminal Law ( email )

REC A919
Faculty of Law University of Amsterdam
Amsterdam, 1001NB
Netherlands

University of Amsterdam - Amsterdam Center for International Law ( email )

REC A919
Faculty of Law University of Amsterdam
Amsterdam, 1001NB
Netherlands

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
73
Abstract Views
490
rank
343,113
PlumX Metrics