Measuring Corruption Indicators and Indices

34 Pages Posted: 11 Feb 2014

See all articles by Debora Malito

Debora Malito

European University Institute

Date Written: February 2014

Abstract

The development of more sophisticated corruption measures has been stimulated by consistent and compelling demands for more effective action against corruption. However, the production of these indicators has rarely been addressed as a ‘technique of governance’ (Davis et al., 2012), or an instrument of ‘governance without government’ (Rosenau & Czempiel, 1992). The first section (1) reviews the major existing measures of corruption, by focusing on different categories of indices and indicators. The second part (2) pays particular attention to the major ontological and methodological criticisms, constraints and pitfalls, connected with these indicators. The third part (3) presents a comparative analysis of two of the most widely used indicators of corruption: the World Bank’s Control of Corruption indicator (CC) and Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index (CPI). The fourth section (4) evaluates the policy implications embedded in the construction and employment of indicators, while the last part of the paper (5) concludes by summarizing the most important questions raised by this analysis.

Keywords: corruption, indicators, governance, Transparency International, World Bank

Suggested Citation

Malito, Debora, Measuring Corruption Indicators and Indices (February 2014). Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper 2014/13, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2393335 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2393335

Debora Malito (Contact Author)

European University Institute ( email )

Villa Schifanoia
133 via Bocaccio
Firenze (Florence), Tuscany 50014
Italy

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
914
Abstract Views
2,604
Rank
52,721
PlumX Metrics