Can Non-Interest Rate Policies Stabilise Housing Markets? Evidence from a Panel of 57 Economies
43 Pages Posted: 27 Feb 2014
Date Written: November 2013
Abstract
Using data from 57 countries spanning more than three decades, this paper investigates the effectiveness of nine non-interest rate policy tools, including macroprudential measures, in stabilising house prices and housing credit. In conventional panel regressions, housing credit growth is significantly affected by changes in the maximum debt-service-to-income (DSTI) ratio, the maximum loan-to-value ratio, limits on exposure to the housing sector and housing-related taxes. But only the DSTI ratio limit has a significant effect on housing credit growth when we use mean group and panel event study methods. Among the policies considered, a change in housing-related taxes is the only policy tool with a discernible impact on house price appreciation.
Keywords: House prices, housing credit, financial stability, macroprudential policy
JEL Classification: G21, G28
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Mitigating the Procyclicality of Basel II
By Rafael Repullo, Jesus Saurina Salas, ...
-
Mitigating the Pro-Cyclicality of Basel II
By Rafael Repullo, Jesus Saurina Salas, ...
-
Financial Sector Pro-Cyclicality: Lessons from the Crisis
By Fabio Panetta, Paolo Angelini, ...
-
The Effects of Bank Capital on Lending: What Do We Know, and What Does It Mean?
-
The Effects of Bank Capital on Lending: What Do We Know, and What Does it Mean?
-
The Procyclical Effects of Bank Capital Regulation
By Rafael Repullo and Javier Suarez
-
The Procyclical Effects of Bank Capital Regulation
By Rafael Repullo and Javier Suarez
-
The Countercyclical Capital Buffer of Basel III: A Critical Assessment
-
Earnings and Capital Management in Alternative Loan Loss Provision Regulatory Regimes
By Jesus Saurina Salas, Daniel Perez, ...