Modern Prostitution Legal Reform and the Return of Volitional Consent

Modern Prostitution Legal Reform and the Return of Volitional Consent, 3 VA. J. CRIM. L. 1 (2015).

35 Pages Posted: 21 Feb 2014 Last revised: 30 Apr 2015

Date Written: February 1, 2014

Abstract

For decades, prostitution laws in America have focused exclusively on contractual consent: the agreement to exchange sexual services for a fee. Courts and legislatures alike ignored volitional consent, or traditional mens rea, by concentrating on the offer and acceptance of the prostitution agreement. In this way, the law disregarded the actor’s choice to engage in the crime. The de facto strict liability nature of the offense rendered it nearly impossible for prostitutes to successfully raise the defenses of duress and necessity. The failure of the law to distinguish between voluntary and involuntary prostitution resulted in charges, trials, and convictions against involuntary actors.

Scholarship has failed to recognize a distinction between contractual and volitional consent within prostitution laws nationwide. Moreover, no article has yet examined all measures of modern prostitution legal reform, its effects, or its return of the element of volitional consent to prostitution statutes. This Article examines the pre-reform contractual nature of the element of consent, the reform’s return of traditional mens rea, and the historical underpinnings of volitional consent in prostitution legal jurisprudence. By distinguishing between individuals who possess the requisite mens rea to commit prostitution and those who do not, modern prostitution reform does more than merely safeguard against unjust convictions: it restores the element of volitional consent to its rightful place within the criminal offense of prostitution.

Keywords: Criminal law, prostitution, sex work, mens rea, strict liability, human trafficking

Suggested Citation

Peters, Amanda J., Modern Prostitution Legal Reform and the Return of Volitional Consent (February 1, 2014). Modern Prostitution Legal Reform and the Return of Volitional Consent, 3 VA. J. CRIM. L. 1 (2015)., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2398612 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2398612

Amanda J. Peters (Contact Author)

South Texas College of Law ( email )

1303 San Jacinto Street
Houston, TX 77002
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
149
Abstract Views
1,037
Rank
354,722
PlumX Metrics