The Copyright Act's Licensing Exemption for Religious Performances of Religious Works Is Unconstitutional

38 Pages Posted: 21 Feb 2014

See all articles by Carolyn Homer Thomas

Carolyn Homer Thomas

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP

Date Written: 2013

Abstract

Copyright Law grants an exclusive right of public performance to copyright owners. 17 U.S.C. § 110(3) exempts religious performances from copyright’s licensing requirements. This article comprehensively addresses the legislative history of this religious exemption, then analyzes the exemption under modern Establishment Clause jurisprudence.

Under Section 110(3), dramatic works, even when performed for-profit and with paid performers, do not need a license if the performance is sufficiently “religious.” This is a broader exemption then those granted to other non-profit organizations under 17 U.S.C. § 110. Because the § 110(3) exemption does not alleviate an exceptional burden on religious exercise, and because it imposes a significant burden on content creators, it does not meet Cutter v. Wilkinson’s standards for permissible religious accommodations. Furthermore, because the statute requires courts to evaluate the religious character of works and services, it necessitates impermissible entanglement. The religious exemption is unconstitutional.

Keywords: religion, copyright, first amendment, accommodations, 17 U.S.C. 110(3)

Suggested Citation

Thomas, Carolyn Homer, The Copyright Act's Licensing Exemption for Religious Performances of Religious Works Is Unconstitutional (2013). DePaul Law Review, Vol. 63, No. 1, p. 49, 2013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2398643

Carolyn Homer Thomas (Contact Author)

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP ( email )

555 Twin Dolphin Dr., Suite 560
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
80
rank
294,745
Abstract Views
501
PlumX Metrics