Choice and Equality: Are Vulnerable Citizens Worse-Off after Liberalization Reforms?

28 Pages Posted: 21 Feb 2014 Last revised: 23 Mar 2018

See all articles by Sebastian Jilke

Sebastian Jilke

McCourt School of Public Policy; Georgetown University

Date Written: 2015

Abstract

In recent decades, we have witnessed a massive restructuring of public service delivery mechanisms, including service liberalization reforms, the pursuit of the choice agenda and the creation of quasimarkets. A central aim of these reforms is that citizens receive better value for money through greater competition among service providers. However, it is debated whether all layers of society are equally able to benefit from these developments. We assess the equality in citizens’ choice behaviour with regard to liberalized services of general interest across 25 countries of the European Union. Our findings show that the gap between lesser and better educated service users, in terms of actual switching behaviour, widens once a considerable degree of service liberalization, as evidenced by the number of service providers, has been achieved. However, this has been only found in the mobile telephony sector and not in the less competitive market of fixed telephony services.

Keywords: equality, liberalization reform, public services, provider choice, vulnerability

JEL Classification: D12, D18, D4, D63, D8

Suggested Citation

Jilke, Sebastian, Choice and Equality: Are Vulnerable Citizens Worse-Off after Liberalization Reforms? (2015). Public Administration, 93(1): 68-85, 2015, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2398902

Sebastian Jilke (Contact Author)

McCourt School of Public Policy; Georgetown University ( email )

Washington, DC 20057
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
106
Abstract Views
932
rank
309,653
PlumX Metrics