Justice on the Fly: The Danger of Errant Deportations

69 Pages Posted: 24 Feb 2014 Last revised: 30 May 2015

See all articles by Fatma E. Marouf

Fatma E. Marouf

Texas A&M University School of Law

Michael Kagan

University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law

Rebecca D. Gill

University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Date Written: 2014

Abstract

The government may deport an immigrant appealing a deportation order in federal court even before the court rules on the case, unless the court issues a stay of removal. In its 2009 decision in Nken v. Holder, the Supreme Court clarified that the legal standard for stays of removal is the same test courts use for preliminary injunctions. Yet Justice Kennedy expressed frustration that the Court had little data to inform its decision. The Court will likely need to revisit this issue, as doubts cloud the meaning of Nken’s main holdings, in part because the government misled the Court. This Article responds to Justice Kennedy’s request for data and sheds light on the doctrinal controversies surrounding stays by presenting groundbreaking empirical analysis of 1646 cases in all the circuits that hear immigration appeals. It offers a singular window into an arena of adjudication where decisions are rarely articulated in writing. Among our most important findings, the circuit courts denied stays of removal in about half of the appeals that were ultimately granted, an alarming type of error that could result in people being errantly deported to countries where they risk persecution or torture. Our results also suggest that legal doctrine makes an important difference in how accurately courts identify which cases merit a stay, but that no magic bullet exists to avoid errors. In order to adopt an effective approach to stays of removal, courts must confront an important value judgment about whether to err on the side of preventing wrongful removal or on the side of avoiding delayed deportation.

Keywords: immigration, deportation, stays of removal, Nken v. Holder

Suggested Citation

Marouf, Fatma E. and Kagan, Michael and Gill, Rebecca D., Justice on the Fly: The Danger of Errant Deportations (2014). Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 75, No. 2, p. 337, 2014; UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2399673

Fatma E. Marouf (Contact Author)

Texas A&M University School of Law ( email )

1515 Commerce St.
Fort Worth, TX 76102
United States

Michael Kagan

University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law ( email )

4505 South Maryland Parkway
Box 451003
Las Vegas, NV 89154
United States

Rebecca D. Gill

University of Nevada, Las Vegas ( email )

4505 S. Maryland Pkwy. Box 455029
Las Vegas, NV NV 89154
United States
7028952525 (Phone)
7028951065 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.rebeccagill.net

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
135
rank
208,164
Abstract Views
1,352
PlumX Metrics