Towards the Declassification of S&P 500 Boards

Harvard Business Law Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp.157-184 (2013).

28 Pages Posted: 28 Feb 2014 Last revised: 24 May 2016

See all articles by Lucian A. Bebchuk

Lucian A. Bebchuk

Harvard Law School; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) and European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)

Scott Hirst

Boston University - School of Law; Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance

June Rhee

Yale University - Yale Program on Financial Stability; Harvard Law School; Yale University - Yale Program on Financial Stability

Date Written: February 1, 2014

Abstract

This report provides an overview and analysis of the work that the Shareholder Rights Project (SRP) undertook on behalf of a number of institutional investors during 2012 and 2013, the SRP’s first two years of operations. During 2012 and 2013, the SRP worked on behalf of eight SRP-represented investors on board declassification proposals submitted for a vote at the 2012 and/or 2013 annual meetings of 122 S&P 500 and Fortune 500 companies, and this work has produced substantial results:

100 Negotiated Outcomes: Negotiated outcomes involving a commitment to board declassification were reached with 100 S&P 500 and Fortune 500 companies, about three-quarters of the companies receiving proposals in 2012 and/or 2013.

58 Successful Precatory Proposals: During 2012 and 2013, declassification proposals brought by SRP-represented investors received majority support at 58 annual meetings of 53 S&P 500 and Fortune 500 companies (all but three of the annual meetings in which such proposals went to a vote), with average support of about 80% of votes cast.

81 Board declassifications: A total of 81 S&P 500 and Fortune 500 companies already declassified their boards during 2012 and 2013 as a result of the work of the SRP and SRP-represented investors. These 81 companies, which have an aggregate market capitalization exceeding one trillion dollars (as of Dec, 31, 2013), represent about 65% of the companies with which engagements took place and about 60% of the S&P 500 companies that had classified boards as of the beginning of 2012.

Expected Impact by End of 2014: The work of the SRP and SRP-represented investors is expected to produce a significant number of additional board declassifications during 2014 as a result of (i) management declassification proposals that will go to a vote pursuant to 2012 and 2013 agreements, (ii) companies agreeing to follow the preferences of shareholders expressed in 58 successful precatory declassification proposals, and (iii) ongoing engagement by the SRP and SRP-represented investors. We estimate that, by the end of 2014, this work will have contributed to movements towards board declassification by about 100 S&P 500 and Fortune 500 companies; this large-scale change can be expected to increase board accountability and thereby to enhance shareholder value and company performance in the affected companies.

Beyond Board Declassification: The SRP’s 2012 and 2013 work also facilitated a substantial increase in successful engagement by public pension funds, and in their ability to obtain governance changes favored by shareholders. The proposals that the SRP worked in 2012 and 2013 on represented over 50% of the shareholder proposals by public pension funds that received majority support in 2012 and 2013, and over 20% of all precatory shareholder proposals (by all proponents) that received majority support in 2012 and 2013.

The Shareholder Rights Project (SRP) is a clinical program operating at Harvard Law School and directed by Professor Lucian Bebchuk. The SRP works on behalf of public pension funds and charitable organizations seeking to improve corporate governance at publicly traded companies, as well as on research and policy projects related to corporate governance. Any views expressed and positions taken by the SRP and its representatives should be attributed solely to the SRP and not to Harvard Law School or Harvard University.

Keywords: Staggered boards, classified boards, shareholder proposals, shareholder voting, shareholder activism, public pension funds, corporate governance

JEL Classification: D21, G12, G23, G32, G34, G35, G38, K22

Suggested Citation

Bebchuk, Lucian A. and Hirst, Scott and Rhee, June, Towards the Declassification of S&P 500 Boards (February 1, 2014). Harvard Business Law Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp.157-184 (2013).. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2400652 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2400652

Lucian A. Bebchuk (Contact Author)

Harvard Law School ( email )

Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
617-495-3138 (Phone)
617-812-0554 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/bebchuk/

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) ( email )

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) and European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)

Scott Hirst

Boston University - School of Law ( email )

765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States

Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance ( email )

1575 Massachusetts
Hauser 406
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

June Rhee

Yale University - Yale Program on Financial Stability ( email )

135 Prospect Street
P.O. Box 208200
New Haven, CT 06520-8200
United States

Harvard Law School ( email )

1563 Massachusetts Ave
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Yale University - Yale Program on Financial Stability

165 Whitney Avenue
P.O. Box 208200
New Haven, CT 06520-8200
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
322
Abstract Views
3,075
rank
93,226
PlumX Metrics