Tribal Disruption and Labor Relations

17 Pages Posted: 27 Feb 2014 Last revised: 2 Oct 2017

See all articles by Matthew L. M. Fletcher

Matthew L. M. Fletcher

Michigan State University - College of Law

Kathryn E Fort

Michigan State University - College of Law

Wenona T. Singel

Michigan State University College of Law

Date Written: February 26, 2014

Abstract

In recent years, Indian tribes have begun to assert treaty rights to govern labor relations within the reservation, most notably in Indian gaming operations. The National Labor Relations Board and several national labor unions have asserted, with a large degree of success, that the National Labor Relations Act governs labor relations in tribal casinos.

This paper addresses several aspects of the tribal-federal-labor relationship through the lens of tribal disruption theory. Professor Wenona Singel has argued, drawing from institutional economics theory, that labor relations law and policy is static, with unions and the NLRB preferring to rely upon Great Depression-era federal law to decide labor disputes arising in Indian country – not because federal law is substantively preferable to tribal law, but because it is known and predictable. These actors reject tribal labor relations legal regimes despite the possibility that tribal law may be substantively preferable to all parties.

Tribal disruption theory offers an alternative view of how to resolve these ongoing labor disputes, one preferable to the uncertain and high stakes litigation.

This paper is prepared for discussion at the 2014 UCLA Race, Labor, and the Law Conference.

Suggested Citation

Fletcher, Matthew L. M. and Fort, Kathryn E and Singel, Wenona T., Tribal Disruption and Labor Relations (February 26, 2014). MSU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-2. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2401711

Matthew L. M. Fletcher (Contact Author)

Michigan State University - College of Law ( email )

648 N. Shaw
East Lansing, MI 48824-1300
United States

Kathryn E Fort

Michigan State University - College of Law ( email )

318 Law College Building
East Lansing, MI 48824-1300
United States

Wenona T. Singel

Michigan State University College of Law ( email )

318 Law College Building
East Lansing, MI 48824-1300
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
113
rank
231,712
Abstract Views
580
PlumX Metrics