Offshore Grids for Renewables: Do We Need a Particular Regulatory Framework?

19 Pages Posted: 1 Mar 2014

See all articles by Leonardo Meeus

Leonardo Meeus

European University Institute; European University Institute - Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies (RSCAS)

Date Written: February 2014

Abstract

Onshore, generators are connected to the transmission grid by TSOs. This regulatory model could simply be extended to offshore (i.e. Germany), but the connection of offshore wind farms to shore is also an opportunity to test alternatives, i.e. the third party model (i.e. the UK) or the generator model (i.e. Sweden). In this paper, we argue that the third party and generator models are indeed better suited to support the evolution towards larger scale offshore wind farms that are increasingly developed farther out to sea, while the TSO model is better suited to support the evolution towards cross-border offshore grid projects. In other words, an important trade-off needs to be made because none of the existing regulatory models can fulfill all the expectations in the current context in Europe. And, the trade-off has to be made at the regional or EU level because the different national regulatory frameworks are incompatible when applied to a cross-border offshore grid project.

Keywords: Renewable energy, offshore wind, grid connection, transmission, regulation

Suggested Citation

Meeus, Leonardo, Offshore Grids for Renewables: Do We Need a Particular Regulatory Framework? (February 2014). Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2402777 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2402777

Leonardo Meeus (Contact Author)

European University Institute ( email )

Fiesole, Tuscany
Italy

European University Institute - Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies (RSCAS) ( email )

Villa La Fonte, via delle Fontanelle 18
50016 San Domenico di Fiesole
Florence, Florence 50014
Italy

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
56
Abstract Views
335
rank
498,742
PlumX Metrics