The Knowledge Police

30 Pages Posted: 7 Mar 2014 Last revised: 3 Apr 2014

See all articles by David Orozco

David Orozco

Florida State University - College of Business

Date Written: March 5, 2014

Abstract

This article provides an in depth analysis and critique of the Office of the Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator’s (IPEC’s) efforts to date. This is an important subject since the IPEC has, under the Pro-IP Act, a mandate to serve as an effective interagency coordinator and strategic advisor to the Legislature and the President in all areas related to intellectual property enforcement. Intellectual property enforcement has risen to the highest levels of policymaking, and national public discourse. As discussed in this article, the IPEC has failed to adequately coordinate the various federal agencies that have overlapping authority in this area. The main reasons for this failure are the IPEC’s lack of strategic planning, which prevent it from prioritizing resources and activities among agencies and the inability to integrate patents as a key enforcement issue. Another important issue is the confusion between the roles of the IPEC and the IPR Center, which seems to be in some cases a more effective coordination vehicle than the IPEC. Policymakers, legislators and oversight bodies may view these findings as a helpful aid to promote greater accountability and effective management within the IPEC.

Keywords: Intellectual property, administrative law, regulation, ITC

JEL Classification: K2, K42

Suggested Citation

Orozco, David, The Knowledge Police (March 5, 2014). Hofstra Law Review, Vol. 43, No. 2, 2014. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2405316 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2405316

David Orozco (Contact Author)

Florida State University - College of Business ( email )

423 Rovetta Business Building
Tallahassee, FL 32306-1110
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
30
Abstract Views
1,801
PlumX Metrics