Comprehensive Transformative Amendments – Theory and Practice: Rethinking the Nineteenth Amendment and the Place of Women’s Rights in the Constitution

Dartmouth Law Journal (2015), Forthcoming

88 Pages Posted: 2 Aug 2014 Last revised: 28 Aug 2014

Date Written: March 7, 2014

Abstract

This article brings together two of the most contested issues in contemporary constitutional law: how to theorize the impact of constitutional amendments upon the broader field of constitutional law and interpretation, and how to understand the place of women’s rights and sex equality in the Constitution. I propose a new typology of constitutional amendments, and then apply it to the Nineteenth Amendment. Traditionally, scholars have classified constitutional amendments into two types: declaratory and transformative. I will deepen this distinction by arguing that transformative amendments may be either political or comprehensive, and that the difference matters to constitutional adjudication. I will then argue that the comprehensive transformative nature of the Nineteenth Amendment requires synthesizing it with the Fourteenth in a manner that justifies a number of constitutional rights, in the domain of sex equality, that the Supreme Court has controversially found – or declined to find – in the last few decades. The paper, therefore, consists of two parts. The first part is theoretical. I begin by explaining the traditional distinction between declaratory and transformative amendments (I). I then distinguish between political transformative amendments, that are limited to changing a set of legal norms, and comprehensive transformative amendments, that repudiate not only legal norms, but a set of cultural and other societal assumptions that underlie the pre-transformation status quo. (II) I conclude by arguing on various principled grounds (III), that Courts must take into account the repudiation of comprehensive moral or ethical systems of values as reflected by comprehensive transformative amendments. (IV) In the second part, I argue that a historical analysis of the American suffrage movement justifies treating the Nineteenth Amendment as a comprehensive transformative amendment (V) I then contend that a synthesis of the Nineteenth and the Fourteenth requires reading into the Fourteenth Amendment’s proscriptions of caste-codes and arbitrary distinctions, those differences that can be traced back to the cultural and ethical assumptions that the Nineteenth Amendment was enacted to repudiate (VI). I conclude by examining certain areas of women’s rights law – e.g., labor regulations, abortion, sex discrimination and disparate impact – and analyze how this theory applies to actual practice, (VII) before briefly concluding (VIII).

Keywords: constitutional law, nineteenth amendment, fourteenth amendment, John Rawls, sex equality

JEL Classification: K39

Suggested Citation

Bhatia, Gautam, Comprehensive Transformative Amendments – Theory and Practice: Rethinking the Nineteenth Amendment and the Place of Women’s Rights in the Constitution (March 7, 2014). Dartmouth Law Journal (2015), Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2406276 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2406276

Gautam Bhatia (Contact Author)

Yale University - Law School ( email )

P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
160
Abstract Views
813
rank
186,758
PlumX Metrics