41 Pages Posted: 13 Mar 2014 Last revised: 31 Mar 2014
Date Written: March 10, 2014
This brief, submitted on behalf of more than 65 law professors who teach and write in the areas of employment law and constitutional law, argues that the Court should reverse the 11th Circuit's decision denying First Amendment protection to a public employee who was allegedly terminated in retaliation for his testimonial speech in a criminal trial.
Keywords: Garcetti, Ceballos, First Amendment, public employee speech
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Nahmod, Sheldon H. and Secunda, Paul M. and Branson, Joshua D. and Bauries, Scott R., Brief of Law Professors as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner, Lane v. Franks, No. 13-483, United States Supreme Court, OT 2013 (March 10, 2014). Marquette Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 14-09. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2407949 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2407949