Rethinking Injury: The Case of Informed Consent

Erin L. Sheley

University of Calgary Faculty of Law

March 12, 2014

2014 Brigham Young University Law Review __ (2015, Forthcoming)

This article argues that the traditional debates between the expressive and compensatory views of tort law ignore the way in which an injury may itself have an expressive component, one that in turn increases the extent of physical harm suffered by a victim. I take up the example of informed consent in the medical malpractice context to show how an excessively narrow idea of physical harm has negative consequences for tort law in general. In these situations, when a physician performs a procedure without providing the patient with sufficient information, we can better understand the harm that occurs through a combination of civil recourse theory and new insights from the field of narrative medicine. Under the current regime, the effort to cabin potential liability for physicians’ well-intended conduct has resulted in a disconnect between a negligence standard — with its requirement of strictly physical injury — and the actual harm in question, which has historically been recognized as at least partially dignitary. I argue that this disconnect can be resolved through a broader view of the nature of the injury suffered when a physician performs an inadequately authorized procedure. A more appropriate view would take into account the newly understood, long-term physical harms that arise when a physician coopts a patient’s subjective knowledge about and narrative control over his body. I then argue that by focusing on remedies that consider the relational quality of the injury imposed on patients in these cases tort scholars can be more responsive to actual harms, not only in the case of informed consent but throughout the tort regime generally.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 14, 2014 ; Last revised: October 14, 2014

Suggested Citation

Sheley, Erin L., Rethinking Injury: The Case of Informed Consent (March 12, 2014). 2014 Brigham Young University Law Review __ (2015, Forthcoming). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2408160

Contact Information

Erin L. Sheley (Contact Author)
University of Calgary Faculty of Law ( email )
Murray Fraser Hall
2500 University Dr. N.W.
Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 795
Downloads: 129
Download Rank: 168,216
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper