The Trouble with Amicus Facts

Alli Orr Larsen

William & Mary Law School

December 8, 2014

Virginia Law Review, Vol. 100 (2014)
William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-273

The number of amicus curiae briefs filed at the Supreme Court is at an all-time high. Most observers, and even some of the Justices, believe that the best of these briefs are filed to supplement the Court’s understanding of facts. Supreme Court decisions quite often turn on generalized facts about the way the world works (Do violent video games harm children? Is a partial birth abortion ever medically necessary?) and to answer these questions the Justices are hungry for more information than the parties and the record can provide. The consensus is that amicus briefs helpfully add factual expertise to the Court’s decision-making.

The goal of this article is to chip away at that conventional wisdom. The trouble with amicus facts, I argue, is that today anyone can claim to be a factual expert. With the Internet, factual information is easily found and cheaply manufactured. Moreover, the amicus curiae has evolved significantly from its origin as an impartial “friend of the court.” Facts submitted by amici are now funneled through the screen of advocacy. The result is that the Court is inundated with eleventh-hour, untested, advocacy-motivated claims of factual expertise. And the Justices are listening. This article looks at the instances in recent years when a Supreme Court Justice cites an amicus for a statement of fact. It describes the way the brief, rather than the underlying factual source, is cited as authority and the failure of the parties to act as an adequate check. I challenge this process as potentially infecting the Supreme Court’s decisions with unreliable evidence, and I make suggestions for ways to reform it. It is time to rethink the expertise-providing role of the Supreme Court amicus and to refashion this old tool for the new purpose to which it is currently being used.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 63

Keywords: Amicus, Supreme Court, Fact-Finding, Fact, Brief

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 15, 2014 ; Last revised: December 9, 2014

Suggested Citation

Larsen, Alli Orr, The Trouble with Amicus Facts (December 8, 2014). Virginia Law Review, Vol. 100 (2014); William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-273. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2409071

Contact Information

Alli Orr Larsen (Contact Author)
William & Mary Law School ( email )
South Henry Street
P.O. Box 8795
Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 9,664
Downloads: 1,845
Download Rank: 5,797