The Informal Property Rights of Boomerang Children in the Home

36 Pages Posted: 17 Mar 2014 Last revised: 25 Nov 2014

Date Written: March 16, 2014


Adult children living with their parents represent an increasingly common social phenomenon in the Unites States that challenges the boundaries of both the family and formal property rights. What is the legal status of adult children living with their parents? Do parents have any additional duties when they rescind permission for their child to live with them? Property and family scholars have not addressed this important issue. This article fills the void. Instead of treating people who live together as strangers, owing no legal obligations to one another, I argue that under certain conditions living with others creates a property community in the home. I call this community "home sharing". Thinking of living with others as a property community allows us to legally recognize the deep commitment between people who share a home. I urge scholars to reconsider the rule that allows an owner to unilaterally revoke permission to live in the home and argue that eviction law should stipulate additional responsibilities when the owner seeks to evict a cohabitee. I do not claim that the child should continue to live at home, but argue for remedies that recognize the child's voice, e.g., a duty to explain and justify the decision, to listen to the child's arguments, and the determination of a cooling-off period.

Keywords: home, boomerang children, property, family, community

Suggested Citation

Kreiczer-Levy, Shelly, The Informal Property Rights of Boomerang Children in the Home (March 16, 2014). Maryland Law Review, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN:

Shelly Kreiczer-Levy (Contact Author)

College of Law and Business ( email )

26 Ben-Gurion St.

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics