Prying, Spying, and Lying: Intrusive Newsgathering and What the Law Should Do About It

78 Pages Posted: 8 Nov 2000 Last revised: 12 Oct 2015

See all articles by Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky

Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky

University of Florida - Levin College of Law

Abstract

The media's use of intrusive newsgathering techniques poses an increasing threat to individual privacy. Courts currently resolve the overwhelming majority of conflicts in favor of the media. This is not because the First Amendment bars the imposition of tort liability on the media for its newsgathering practices. It does not. Rather, tort law has failed to seize the opportunity to create meaninful privacy protection. After surveying the economic, philosophical, and practical obstacles to reform, this Article proposes to rejuvenate the tort of intrusion to tip the balance between privacy and the press back in privacy's direction. Working within the framework of traditional tort law, this Article advocates reform of intrusion's doctrinal flaws followed by the adoption of a newsgatherer's privilege to protect media intrusions that serve a significant public interest.

Keywords: tort, privacy, intrusion, media, press, First Amendment, newsgathering, newsgatherer

Suggested Citation

Lidsky, Lyrissa Barnett, Prying, Spying, and Lying: Intrusive Newsgathering and What the Law Should Do About It. Tulane Law Review, Vol. 73, p. 173, 1998, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=241031

Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky (Contact Author)

University of Florida - Levin College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 117625
Gainesville, FL 32611-7625
United States
352.392.2211 (Phone)
352.392.3005 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
79
Abstract Views
2,111
rank
424,872
PlumX Metrics