The Canada-China FIPPA: Its Uniqueness and Non-Reciprocity

Canadian Yearbook of International Law/ Annuaire Canadien de droit international (2014) Forthcoming

60 Pages Posted: 19 Mar 2014 Last revised: 21 Mar 2014

See all articles by Gus Van Harten

Gus Van Harten

York University - Osgoode Hall Law School

Date Written: March 17, 2014

Abstract

It is demonstrated that the signed (but not ratified) Canada-China Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement (FIPPA) is novel and, in key respects, non-reciprocal in favour of China. For example, the FIPPA would provide a general right of market access by Chinese investors to Canada but not by Canadian investors to China, allow wider scope for investment screening by China than by Canada, remove a longstanding Canadian reservation for performance requirements that favour aboriginal peoples, and dilute Canada's established position on transparency in investor-state arbitration. These and other aspects of the FIPPA are highlighted via a comparison to other trade and investment treaties, especially of Canada, that provide for investor-state arbitration. The article responds partly to claims by Canadian trade officials that the FIPPA is unremarkable because it simply continues Canada’s past practice.

Keywords: bilateral investment treaty, investor-state arbitration, FIPPA, BIT

Suggested Citation

Van Harten, Gus, The Canada-China FIPPA: Its Uniqueness and Non-Reciprocity (March 17, 2014). Canadian Yearbook of International Law/ Annuaire Canadien de droit international (2014) Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2410532

Gus Van Harten (Contact Author)

York University - Osgoode Hall Law School ( email )

4700 Keele Street
Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3
Canada
416 650 8419 (Phone)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
571
Abstract Views
3,125
rank
49,446
PlumX Metrics