A Review of Archival Auditing Research

134 Pages Posted: 20 Mar 2014 Last revised: 5 Sep 2014

See all articles by Mark L. DeFond

Mark L. DeFond

University of Southern California - Leventhal School of Accounting

Jieying Zhang

The University of Texas at Dallas

Date Written: August 2014

Abstract

We define higher audit quality as greater assurance of high financial reporting quality. Researchers use many proxies for audit quality, with little guidance on choosing among them. We provide a framework for systematically evaluating their unique strengths and weaknesses. Because it is inextricably intertwined with financial reporting quality, audit quality also depends on firms’ innate characteristics and financial reporting systems. Our review of the models commonly used to disentangle these constructs suggests the need for better conceptual guidance. Finally, we urge more research on the role of auditor and client competency in driving audit quality.

Suggested Citation

DeFond, Mark and Zhang, Jieying, A Review of Archival Auditing Research (August 2014). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2411228 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2411228

Mark DeFond (Contact Author)

University of Southern California - Leventhal School of Accounting ( email )

Accounting Building, Room 206
Los Angeles, CA 90089-0441
United States
213-740-5016 (Phone)
213-747-2815 (Fax)

Jieying Zhang

The University of Texas at Dallas ( email )

2601 North Floyd Road
Richardson, TX 75083-0688
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
2,520
Abstract Views
49,075
rank
4,787
PlumX Metrics