The ICC and Common Purpose: What Contribution is Required Under Article 25(3)(d)?

in: Stahn (ed.), The Law and Practice of the ICC: A Critical Account of Challenges and Achievements, Oxford: OUP 2015

16 Pages Posted: 21 Mar 2014 Last revised: 17 Jul 2015

See all articles by Kai Ambos

Kai Ambos

University of Goettingen (Gottingen)

Date Written: 2015

Abstract

Article 25(3)(d) has not yet been the object of much academic or jurisprudential debate, but the few authors who have attempted to make sense of the provision have had serious problems in doing so and have therefore fiercely criticized it. This paper will not deal with all the possible aspects and problems but will rather focus, after some general preliminary remarks, on the quality or nature of the contribution required by Article 25(3)(d) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC). Some other issues of the provision are only dealt with insofar as they relate to the contribution issue.

Suggested Citation

Ambos, Kai, The ICC and Common Purpose: What Contribution is Required Under Article 25(3)(d)? (2015). in: Stahn (ed.), The Law and Practice of the ICC: A Critical Account of Challenges and Achievements, Oxford: OUP 2015. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2411981 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2411981

Kai Ambos (Contact Author)

University of Goettingen (Gottingen) ( email )

Platz der Göttinger Sieben 5
Göttingen, 37073
Germany

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
286
Abstract Views
1,539
rank
108,628
PlumX Metrics