The Uncertain Promise of Predictive Coding

Dana Remus

University of North Carolina School of Law

March 1, 2014

Iowa Law Review, Vol. 99, p. 101, 2014

Increasingly, machine-learning technologies known as “predictive coding” are automating document review in discovery practice. Recent law school graduates may lament the impact on entry-level law hiring, but the litigation community is embracing the new technologies. Proponents contend that by replacing the unreliable and inconsistent discretion of lawyers with the mechanized objectivity of computers, predictive-coding technologies can solve both the practical problems of e-discovery and the deeper-seated problems of excess, abuse, and trust that have long plagued discovery practice.

In this Article, I advise caution in the adoption of predictive-coding technologies. These technologies hold unquestionable potential as a means of coping with unmanageable datasets, but they entail costs as well as benefits. I argue that if lawyers ignore these costs, they will unwittingly abdicate control to computer scientists and vendors, compromising the profession’s jurisdiction and undermining lawyers’ ability to serve clients and the judicial system. I conclude that the profession has an ethical obligation to explore the costs as well as the benefits of predictive coding, and to play a more active role in its design and use.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 33

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 28, 2014  

Suggested Citation

Remus, Dana, The Uncertain Promise of Predictive Coding (March 1, 2014). Iowa Law Review, Vol. 99, p. 101, 2014. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2417014

Contact Information

Dana Remus (Contact Author)
University of North Carolina School of Law ( email )
160 Ridge Road
Chapel Hill, NC 27599

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,199
Downloads: 227
Download Rank: 106,139