In Defense of Formal Modeling in the Social Sciences

6 Pages Posted: 30 Mar 2014

See all articles by Joel J. van der Weele

Joel J. van der Weele

University of Amsterdam - Center for Experimental Economics and political Decision making (CREED); Tinbergen Institute; Center for Financial Studies (CFS)

Date Written: March 28, 2014

Abstract

This essay was written following discussions with friends and colleagues from different disciplines about the use of mathematics in the social sciences. It sets out some of the advantages of mathematical modeling (MM) in the social sciences, and defends it against some of the common criticisms that I have encountered. The main argument is that theories of the social world necessarily involve abstractions and trade-offs between the detail of the analysis and its tractability. Mathematics is a way to make these trade-offs in the clearest possible way, and this clarity makes discussion and empirical testing easier. Not all MM is based on such Popperian arguments. Often, models have a more artistic aspiration, of providing a metaphor or caricature of some feature of reality in order to understand it better. Finally, like any research methodology, mathematical theorizing does have its limits and associated problems, which I will also briefly discuss.

Keywords: Methodology, mathematical modeling

Suggested Citation

van der Weele, Joel J., In Defense of Formal Modeling in the Social Sciences (March 28, 2014). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2417510 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2417510

Joel J. Van der Weele (Contact Author)

University of Amsterdam - Center for Experimental Economics and political Decision making (CREED) ( email )

Roetersstraat 11
Amsterdam, 1018 WB
Netherlands

HOME PAGE: http://https://sites.google.com/site/joelvdweele/

Tinbergen Institute ( email )

Burg. Oudlaan 50
Rotterdam, 3062 PA
Netherlands

Center for Financial Studies (CFS) ( email )

Gr├╝neburgplatz 1
Frankfurt am Main, 60323
Germany

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
113
rank
239,104
Abstract Views
675
PlumX Metrics