Whose Trojan Horse? The Dynamics of Resistance against IFRS

108 Pages Posted: 1 Apr 2014 Last revised: 29 Aug 2023

See all articles by Martin Gelter

Martin Gelter

Fordham University School of Law; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)

Zehra G. Kavame Eroglu

Deakin University, Geelong, Australia - Deakin Law School

Date Written: September 1, 2017


The introduction of International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) has been debated in the United States since at least the accounting scandals of the early 2000s. While publicly traded firms around the world are increasingly switching to IFRS, often because they are required to do so by law or by their stock exchange, the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) seems to have become more reticent in recent years. Only foreign issuers have been permitted to use IFRS in the United States since 2007. By contrast, the EU has mandated the use of IFRS in the consolidated financial statements of publicly traded firms since 2005. In the United States, IFRS, which are promulgated by the London-based International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”), are often seen as an attempt by Europeans to colonize U.S. accounting standard setting, and as an element of a foreign legal system alien to U.S. capital markets and securities law. In this article, we suggest that this perception is actually a myth, which we attempt to debunk. In fact, the introduction of IFRS in Europe, particularly Continental Europe, was far from controversial. IFRS were promoted by Anglo-Saxon jurisdictions and strongly supported by the United States, particularly when capital markets internationalized in the 1990s. They were — and still are — in many ways at odds with the Continental European accounting cultures of countries such as France and Germany, on whose examples we draw. In spite of the EU mandate for publicly traded firms, accounting law in these jurisdictions has still not fully absorbed IFRS; nevertheless, for now a solution that reconciles traditional and international accounting has been found. In this article, we explore the problems and resistance of IFRS in Continental Europe and seek to draw lessons for the United States. We argue that given the shared heritage of U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) and IFRS as investor-oriented accounting standards, their introduction in the United States should be considerably easier than it was on the other side of the Atlantic.

Keywords: IFRS, IAS, GAAP, international accounting, EU Company Law Directives, Fourth Directive, Seventh Directive

JEL Classification: K22, M41

Suggested Citation

Gelter, Martin and Kavame Eroglu, Zehra G., Whose Trojan Horse? The Dynamics of Resistance against IFRS (September 1, 2017). 36 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 89 (2014), European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) - Law Working Paper No. 254/2014, Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2418356, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2418356

Martin Gelter (Contact Author)

Fordham University School of Law ( email )

150 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States
646-312-8752 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.fordham.edu/info/23135/martin_gelter

European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)

HOME PAGE: http://ecgi.global/users/martin-gelter

Zehra G. Kavame Eroglu

Deakin University, Geelong, Australia - Deakin Law School ( email )

221 Burwood Highway
Burwood, Victoria 3125, Victoria 3125

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics