Defending Vicarious Felony Murder

47 Texas Tech L. Rev. 129 (2014)

21 Pages Posted: 3 Apr 2014 Last revised: 8 Jun 2015

See all articles by Steven R. Morrison

Steven R. Morrison

University of North Dakota School of Law

Date Written: April 1, 2014

Abstract

Felony murder is a much-maligned and much-misunderstood doctrine. At its broadest, it is indefensible. Guyora Binder and David Crump have compellingly shown that this broad felony murder never really existed and that the limitations that jurisdictions have placed on the doctrine largely make it normatively acceptable.

Vicarious felony murder, however, has not been so defended. This article provides such a defense, drawing from philosophy and psychology work on joint shared intention, action and omission, and imputation of culpability. It concludes that, to the extent that underlying felony murder is normatively appropriate and methods of proof are reliable, vicarious felony murder is also eminently defensible because it reliably functions to discern culpability and impose condign punishment.

Keywords: felony murder, vicarious liability, criminal law, homicide

Suggested Citation

Morrison, Steven R., Defending Vicarious Felony Murder (April 1, 2014). 47 Texas Tech L. Rev. 129 (2014), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2419119

Steven R. Morrison (Contact Author)

University of North Dakota School of Law ( email )

215 Centennial Drive Stop 9003
Grand Forks, ND 58202
United States
617-749-7817 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
117
Abstract Views
990
Rank
445,841
PlumX Metrics