Mapping Supreme Court Doctrine: Civil Pleading

11 Pages Posted: 9 Apr 2014 Last revised: 20 May 2015

Scott Dodson

University of California Hastings College of the Law

Colin P. Starger

University of Baltimore - School of Law

Date Written: April 7, 2014

Abstract

This essay, adapted from the video presentation available on Vimeo as #89845875, graphically depicts the genealogy and evolution of federal civil pleading standards in U.S. Supreme Court opinions over time. We show that the standard narrative — of a decline in pleading liberality from Conley to Twombly to Iqbal — is complicated by both progenitors and progeny. We therefore offer a fuller picture of the doctrine of Rule 8 pleading that ought to be of use to judges and practitioners in federal court. We also hope, through the video presentation, to introduce a new visual format for academic scholarship that capitalizes on the virtues of narration, graphics, mapping, online accessibility, and electronic dissemination.


Keywords: video article, video project, Twombly, iqbal, twiqbal, Rule 8, pleading, vimeo, conley, leatherman, swierkiewicz, skinner, matrixx, papasan, dura, broudo

Suggested Citation

Dodson, Scott and Starger, Colin P., Mapping Supreme Court Doctrine: Civil Pleading (April 7, 2014). Federal Courts Law Review, Vol. 7, No. 1, p. 275, 2014; UC Hastings Research Paper No. 102; University of Baltimore School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2015-06. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2422160

Scott Dodson (Contact Author)

University of California Hastings College of the Law ( email )

200 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
United States
415-581-8959 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.uchastings.edu/faculty-administration/faculty/dodson/index.html

Colin P. Starger

University of Baltimore - School of Law ( email )

1420 N. Charles Street
Baltimore, MD 21218
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
89
Rank
235,899
Abstract Views
1,499